Saif Ali Khan’s Ancestral Property: Unpacking the ‘Enemy Property’ Dispute

Explore the ongoing legal battle over Saif Ali Khan’s ancestral properties in Madhya Pradesh, declared ‘enemy property’ by the government.

A Princely Legacy Under Scrutiny

The Pataudi family’s ancestral properties, valued at a staggering Rs 15,000 crore, have been embroiled in a complex legal battle, recently seeing a significant turn. Actor Saif Ali Khan, a prominent figure of the Pataudi lineage, has been at the forefront of this dispute, challenging the government’s decision to label these extensive assets as ‘enemy property’. This classification is rooted in historical events following the Partition of India.

Understanding the ‘Enemy Property’ Act

For many, the term ‘enemy property’ might sound puzzling. Simply put, the Enemy Property Act of 1968 grants the central government the authority to claim properties belonging to individuals who migrated to Pakistan after the 1947 Partition. In this particular case, the complexities arise from the migration of Abida Sultan, the eldest daughter of Nawab Hamidullah Khan (Saif Ali Khan’s maternal grandfather), to Pakistan in 1950. While her sister, Sajida Sultan (Saif’s paternal grandmother), remained in India and was deemed the legal heir, Abida Sultan’s move has formed the basis for the government’s claim.

The High Court’s Recent Directive

In a notable development, the Madhya Pradesh High Court recently set aside a 2000 trial court order that had recognized Saif Ali Khan, along with his sisters Soha and Saba, and mother Sharmila Tagore, as the rightful successors to these ancestral properties. The High Court has now directed the trial court to rehear the entire property succession dispute afresh, setting a clear timeframe of one year for its resolution. This indicates a deep dive into the historical records and legal precedents surrounding the Pataudi estate.

Key Properties in Question

The properties at the heart of this legal contention are vast and include significant landholdings in Bhopal and Raisen, Madhya Pradesh. Among the notable assets mentioned in the appeals are:

Kohefiza’s Flag House
Ahmedabad Palace
The Kothi and forest located in Chiklod, Raisen
Noor-e-Saba
Dar-us-Salam
Four Quarters
New Quarters
Fars Khana

These properties represent not just monetary value but also a rich historical and cultural legacy tied to the former princely state of Bhopal.

Navigating a Complex Succession

The intricacies of this case also stem from the succession laws of the princely state of Bhopal. Nawab Hamidullah Khan, the last Nawab, passed away in 1960, after Bhopal had merged with the Indian Union in 1949. The Pataudi family argues that special rights of the Nawab continued post-merger and that personal property succession should follow the Bhopal Throne Succession Act, 1947. However, the Supreme Court had previously struck down this Act on merger. The High Court’s decision to send the case back to the trial court underscores the need for a thorough re-evaluation of all legal and historical nuances. This ongoing saga highlights the complexities of inherited wealth and historical classifications in India’s legal landscape.